Son of snark

[litlover12]

Here we have the trailer to the fourth Underworld film. Because when critics and audiences alike dump all over a film, it really means that they want you making sequels into eternity.

Oh, Charles Dance . . . you must have REALLY needed a paycheck.

Comments

[ever-maedhros.livejournal.com]

I'm actually very, very, very excited about a fourth movie. Probably because I'd love to be Kate Beckinsale running around in black leather killing evil vampires. *hides for a second*

But in this one, she's apparently killing humans. Not so sure I'll enjoy that . . .

Oh, well. I'll wait and see. Chances are, it may turn out to be terrible, in which case I will happily jump on the snark bandwagon. :)

[litlover12.livejournal.com]

That's all right. You may delay your snark as long as necessary. ;-)

[ever-maedhros.livejournal.com]

Thank you. I shall. :)

[2theriver2pray.livejournal.com]

I was very excited about this too. It has been a little tampered from knowing the plot of the film. I was a little okay they are kind of stealing from Twilight now.

It has Kate and vampires. I have a soft spot for vampires since I was nicknamed vampire in junior high by classmates. I always pale and rarely there since I was always sick.

The humans she's killing better be really, really evil. :(

Plus Charles Dance!!!! I'd watch him read a phone book.

[ever-maedhros.livejournal.com]

They're stealing from Twilight? Oh, no. No, no, no, no, NO! One of the things I loved best about the previous movies (mostly the first one) was it was nothing like Twilight.

I've never liked vampires--but I'm pale, to the point where, when I shied away from a really, really bright light during an checkup, my eye doctor called me a vampire. (Ironic thing is, now I'm writing a vampire book that I hope to submit to and get accepted by a publisher. And all the vampires die. LOL!)

I agree--if she's killing innocents, I will not be amused.

Without Bill Nighy there, they have to get somebody awesome like Charles Dance. :)