Why I fail as an Austenite
Jun. 13th, 2011 11:36 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've finished another viewing of the 1995 P&P, which I love. But oh, how the second proposal scene bugs me. And it bugs me that it bugs me. Because I don't want it to bug me. It's very sweet and the actors are terrific and their facial expressions are all that could be desired. But they don't kiss, and they don't touch -- they look away from each other and keep walking! It drives me NUTS! I'm going "Kiss her! Kiss her!!" like that nosy old man in It's a Wonderful Life. I know this is Austen and she's prim and proper to the nth degree, and the whole thing is true to her vision, but for heaven's sake. . . . couldn't they at least hold hands?
Of course, it's not much better than what happens in the book. I love Austen, I really do. She was a genius and many of her books are right up there among my favorites. But her love scenes are just so . . . unsatisfying.
Of course, it's not much better than what happens in the book. I love Austen, I really do. She was a genius and many of her books are right up there among my favorites. But her love scenes are just so . . . unsatisfying.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 06:23 am (UTC)Perhaps it would help you enjoy the scene more if you think of them as wanting to wait until they're 100% sure they're alone. For all they know, Kitty could be lurking behind in the pretty scenery, spying on them. I know I wouldn't want a giggly little sister watching me with my fiancee. Just my two cents. :D
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 06:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 06:27 am (UTC)I actually am still immature enough to not totally appreciate kissing. I've gotten to where I'm not grossed out, but I don't miss it when it isn't there. :-) So lack thereof in Jane Austen films doesn't bother me at all. I just need the words.
On a random note, have you seen the Pride and Prejudice from 1980? In my opinion it is much better than the 1995 one, but it's not as flashy, and no one seems to know about it.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 06:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 09:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 11:46 am (UTC)Have you ever seen The Holiday? I like to think of the scene you described kind of the way I picture Jack Black and Kate Winslet's characters in a scene toward the end of that movie. Elizabeth and Darcy are totally squeeing/fist-pumping on the inside. :D
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 11:52 am (UTC)I don't really want them to be untrue to Austen; it's just . . . they look away from each other! Argghh! It just kills me! :-) If she could even just take his arm or something . . .
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 01:43 pm (UTC)Man, I really want to draw this, now...
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:02 pm (UTC)I'm so glad you gave that link. I hate Diaz/Law side of that film, but the Winslet/Black romance IS WIN!
AND THAT MOMENT SHOWS EXACTLY WHY!
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:19 pm (UTC)I mainly watch this movie for Kate and Jack... and for the music, which is EPIC and fills me with tons of dramatic glee.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:53 pm (UTC)Eh, sorry for the ramble. I sort of spend a lot of time re-writing movies in my head. :D
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 09:28 pm (UTC)But I just couldn't get over her and her little, "could we do that again," after making it clear she wanted nothing to do with men. It seemed to come OUT OF NOWHERE, even taking rebounds and people-not-really-knowing-what-they-want into consideration.
And YES, the fact that their "relationship" was all about the smex is probably what bothered me most. Start things with a one-night stand if you absolutely must, but bring something tangible into the relationship fast after that to make it honestly believable.
But I guess this is why they say sex sells. Blech.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 08:41 pm (UTC)"Methinks Jane couldn't write good love scenes because as a spinster who was never around men, she didn't know how one would go, since they didn't have television in those days..."
I can understand that (I can even identify with it). I can't help wishing, though, that she'd gotten a married friend or relative to share a few tips! She'll write something like "She said just what a lady ought to say" or "He expressed himself warmly," and I'm all, "JANE, YOU ARE BEING COY AGAIN. STOP IT."
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 02:49 pm (UTC)I think I have come to appreciate it, but still wish for something more demonstrative. ;)
no subject
Date: 2011-06-14 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 12:34 am (UTC)Have you ever read Louisa May Alcott's evasion of a love scene in An Old-Fashioned Girl?
no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 03:36 am (UTC)"Never mind what happened for a little bit. Love scenes, if genuine, are indescribable, for to those who have enacted them, the most elaborate description seems tame, and to those who have not, the simplest picture seems overdone. So romancers had better let imagination paint for them that which is above all art and leave their lovers to themselves during the happiest minutes of their lives."
Very wise, but unfortunately fiction as a whole can only use this disclaimer once, so the rest of us will have to muddle on without breaking the fourth wall. ;)
no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 12:22 pm (UTC)However, I must disagree on Austen as inferior in love scenes. To me, descriptions of kissing and such in Austen's acerbic style would be very odd, and the understated/unstated passion is all the more powerful for being implied rather than shown.