litlover12: (P1)
Funny thing about Madeleine L'Engle. When she's good (the Time series, The Joys of Love, Two-Part Invention), she's very, VERY good. But when she's bad . . . well, you know.

Alas, I have to place A Severed Wasp in the latter category. This is largely the fault of its protagonist, Katherine Forrester Vigneras, quite possibly the most unappealing heroine L'Engle ever wrote. In her adolescence (in The Small Rain) she wasn't so bad, but in her old age she's prickly, self-absorbed, and insufferable. And as we find out through flashbacks, her morals leave quite a lot to be desired. I don't mean to be judgmental, but I can think of few people who wouldn't be shocked and offended by what she and her husband did in the past -- and even more shocked and offended by their reasons for doing it. They had both suffered greatly during World War II, especially him, but their response to their experiences is atrocious. And the fact that L'Engle lets their actions pass pretty much without comment makes me seriously question her judgment, which makes me sad, because there really are a lot of things that I like about her. (It's not the first L'Engle book to make me do so, though; I had much the same reaction to Camilla, although what happened there wasn't quite so icky.)

All this -- although the icky part is a secret from nearly all the other characters -- makes it all the weirder that everyone Katherine meets virtually worships her from the get-go. There's this sort of mass reaction of "Just sitting here with you for five minutes has completely changed my life for the better, and just hearing your voice on the phone takes away all my fear, and here, have some tea, and have some dinner, and let me rub your back, and please may I name my firstborn child after you?" Okay, she's an astonishingly brilliant pianist, but good grief. The woman comes across like the love child of Dr. House and Mary Sue.

Frankly, it's almost a relief when, late in the book, someone confesses to hating Katherine. So naturally, it turns out that that person is sick in the head.

I won't say there aren't wonderful glimmers of insight here about the arts, family life, faith, and life in general. But the book is mostly Katherine, and that makes it, in my estimation, not a very good book. Two stars out of five.

Now I'm reading A Preface to Paradise Lost by C. S. Lewis.
litlover12: (P1)
This weekend turned out to be chaotic, hence the lack of updates. But I've now finished not only Woe Is I, but also another book that I got for Christmas. More on that momentarily.

I was expecting something like Lynne Truss's great Eats, Shoots & Leaves, but Woe Is I turns out to be more of a reference book. It's a pretty good one, though. Very basic, and occasionally the approach is a little more easygoing than I prefer. Its philosophy could be summed up by this sentence from the glossary: "We adopt rules when we need them and discard them when we don't, so the rules are always changing." But it's readable and helpful and, I think, would be a useful desk reference for most people who are trying to learn the ropes of writing, or who need a refresher course now and then. And the example sentences and the chapter headings and subheadings are great (e.g., "Plurals Before Swine," "The Compleat Dangler," "Metaphors Be with You"). Four out of five stars.

And a rare five-star rating goes to Ophelia Joined the Group Maidens Who Don't Float: Classic Lit Signs on to Facebook by Sarah Schmelling, which my parents gave me for Christmas. It's just what it sounds like, and it's hilariously awesome. For example:

"Dr. Frankenstein removed 'bodybuilding' from his Interests."

"Pip became a fan of Mean Girls."

"Scarlett threw a Scarlett at Ashley! Fan yourself, heave your bosom at, rustle your petticoat, or do something else."

And so on. I could quote this thing all day. In fact, I'll probably be quoting it every now and then for a while, here and at Dickensblog, just because it's too much fun to keep to myself. (I was going to say "for the foreseeable future" instead of "for a while," but Woe Is I says not to. It says you can put a preposition at the end of a sentence, however.)

A word about the star system: I'm not really comparing the books against each other, but against themselves. Thus, I'm not trying to say that Sarah Schmelling or Patricia T. O'Conner is a better writer than Edith Wharton -- just that I happened to like their books a lot, whereas I didn't think The Reef was among Wharton's best. It's a very subjective system . . . but then, reviews and ratings generally are subjective, I guess.

I'm now reading A Severed Wasp by Madeleine L'Engle.

Profile

litlover12: (Default)
litlover12

January 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 02:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios